A pronunciaton feature would be nice

Chitty chity bang bang

A lot of things would be nice. Itā€™s historical. Pronunciation when? Where? By whom?

1 Like

Possibly, a proper pronunciation in the present would be most relatable.

However, with my dictionary, I can always look up the proper pronunciation. Lazy.

In some languages, mostly those with a strict phonetic tie between written and spoken form, one could perhaps dare define a correct pronunciation - and even there a number of local accents would make it frustrating.
English is not among those languages, par excellence: countless native speakers around the world pronounce it in their own way, the only proper one, and itā€™s still a mystery to me how the hell they manage to understand each other.

OK, there are websites that accept the implicit challenge and claim to provide the ā€œcorrectā€ pronunciation of English words either acoustically or graphically, and theyā€™re certainly good enough to tell you if ā€œgeekā€ should be pronounced ā€œÉ”iĖkā€ or ā€œdŹ’iĖkā€ - however beyond that point relying on them blindly might not be the case, unless they tell you clearly what English they refer to.

Thatā€™s bad enough for the present, but for a site centered on etymology things are still worse, much worse. Etymology has to deal a lot with the past, very often with a past that left us precious little to guess how words were uttered then: Chesar, Tzesar or Kesar? For all I know the topic is still being debated.
Thatā€™s why I totally share Dougā€™s point above, for his admirable conciseness as well as for the lot his few words say.

1 Like

Oh, excruciatingly lazy. Couldnā€™t get him off that couch with a stick of dynamite. Always thumbing a game console or swiping slack-jawed at his phone.